[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Rollei] Urgent-buying decision 2.8F Xenotar vs. Planar vs. GX
- Subject: Re: [Rollei] Urgent-buying decision 2.8F Xenotar vs. Planar vs. GX
- From: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 22:49:22 +0200 (MEST)
I fear there is not enough time until Friday. If this list undertakes
to answer and discuss your questions in detail it will take two weeks
and will flood your mailbox. I'll try nevertheless, from my
a) the multicoating will not make much difference except when shooting
against the light - 'contre jour'. I do not own a GX but can compare
HFT and non-HFT Planars for Rollei SLRs and am unable to see a
difference in optical performance 'with' the light, even though these
lenses have 7 elements instead of 5 in the TLRs. The Xenotar is an
exceptionally good lens, by ALL standards. If the camera in question is
a late 2,8F the lens could even have multi coating without any
designation on the camera.
The selenium light meter in the old Rolleiflexes is too inaccurate for
slides but sufficient for print film, if working properly.
Unfortunately many meters of this kind do read low in bright light. And
even if you checked this and yours worked alright the selenium cell
could start to degrade any day from now. So when buying this camera be
prepared to regularly use a hand held meter. If you can live with that,
go for the 2,8F, it feels better than the GX and has other advantages.
The meter in the GX though is the same than in the SLX/6000/SL66E and
is very, very, very accurate.
b) A UV or any other filter does not help. Any filter degrades image
quality - a MC filter less so than plain glass but still does.
c) There is NO visible difference in image quality between Planar and
Xenotar. Both lens manufacturers were required to meet Rollei's
standards and did so.
For the price of US$ 800 the camera should be in fairly good condition,
also optically, I should think.
Now let's see what the others think.
Dirk Seffern schrieb:
> I have the possibility to buy a Rollei 2.8F with a
> Schneider Xenotar lens
> for 800 USD 'til friday. Condition is used, but
> I am thinking now, whether that is a good purchse
> compared to a Rollei 2.8 F
> (with the Zeiss Planar) or a 2.8 GX.
> I have heard from others that the Multicoating of the GX
> would make a quiet
> big difference in image quality with colorslides and
> colorprints. also the
> lightmeter of the GX should be a lot better.
> a. do you agree with these statements?
> b. Would it help to put a multicoated skylight/UV filter
> on the lens?
> c. Is there a difference in picture quality between the
> 2.8F Planar and 2.8F
> Xenotar, if yes where exactly?
> Thanks in advance
> Dirk Seffern